Towards an Anthropology of Deliberation

نویسنده

  • Christopher M. Kelty
چکیده

This article explores the assemblage of voting: electoral systems, Direct Recording Electronic voting machines (DREs), ballots and ballot booths, and the central role of secrecy. Its aim is to argue that the contemporary political subjectivity of deliberation is intimately tied up with this assemblage. Based on ethnographic research, this article shows how controversies around DREs can reveal the ways in which the very possibility for deliberation is tied to the structure and implementation of these machines. It argues for a new approach to deliberation that includes debate, participation and co-construction of the technical systems whereby we vote, as well as those where we express opinions. Towards an Anthropology of Deliberation Christopher M. Kelty 1

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The Multiplicity of Habit: Implications for Routines Research1

This paper explores habit as a foundational concept for routines research. We examine how habit and habitus have been conceptualized in psychology and sociology, giving particular attention to the role of deliberation and mindfulness. Drawing on this work, we develop a typology of habit that is based in the extent of deliberation by the individual performing an activity, and the variability in ...

متن کامل

Communication Regarding Sustainability: Conceptual Perspectives and Exploration of Societal Subsystems

Sustainability issues are typically characterized by high complexity and uncertainty. In light of this, communication plays a crucial role in coping with these challenges. The previous debate on sustainability communication has largely focused on how to communicate sustainability issues to others. Sustainability communication, however, involves more than sender oriented communication to persuad...

متن کامل

Towards a richer model of deliberation dialogue: Closure problem and change of circumstances

Models of deliberative dialogue are fundamental for developing autonomous systems that support human practical reasoning. The question discussed in this paper is whether existing models are able to capture the complexity and richness of natural deliberation. In real-world contexts, circumstances relevant to the decision can change rapidly. We reflect on today’s leading model of deliberation dia...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:

دوره   شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2009